It’s like putting threads on a twat.

A trip down memory lane with this 2-year-old news clip.  But some things, like Hillary Clinton’s abominable fashion, never outgrow themselves.

Lipstick on a pig.

Threads on a twat.

Same difference, right?


Hillary Clinton took a lot of flak on Monday after a report surfaced that the presidential candidate wore a Giorgio Armani jacket worth more than $12,000 during a speech in April about inequality.

Clinton, who was well-known for her vast pantsuit collection, has upgraded her wardrobe during her most recent bid for president to appear more relatable, according to the New York Post.


Not to single her out, of course.

Politicians are a vile lot of sartorial scumbags and while they speak compassion out one side of their mouths, they indulge in hedonistic bidding out the other.

But Hillary’s disingenuous ideological hypocrisy is particularly noxious since her whole leftist DNC shtick concerns compassion for the poor and suffering and downtrodden.

Meanwhile, she wears ugly shit like this. Why are expensive designer clothes so utterly gross?



In some ways, their grossness finds the perfect living mannequin in Hillary. Dress her up, fancy her up, she is still miserable disgusting old Hillary.

Just putting threads on a twat, my friends.