CHICAGO (AP) — A 15-year-old Chicago girl was apparently sexually assaulted by five or six men or boys on Facebook Live, and none of the roughly 40 people who watched the live video reported the attack to police, authorities said Tuesday.
Police only learned of the attack when the girl’s mother approached police Superintendent Eddie Johnson late Monday afternoon as he was leaving a department in the Lawndale neighborhood on the city’s West Side, police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said. She told him her daughter had been missing since Sunday and showed him screen grab photos of the alleged assault.
He said Johnson immediately ordered detectives to investigate and the department asked Facebook to take down the video, which it did.
Guglielmi tweeted Tuesday that detectives found the girl and reunited her with her family, and that they’re conducting interviews.
He said Johnson was “visibly upset” after he watched the video, both by its contents and the fact that there were “40 or so live viewers and no one thought to call authorities.”
I wonder how women will march to commemorate this event. Will they leave their vagina hats at home?
If this is to be construed as “real news,” law enforcement reports that surveillance footage captured the theft of a Secret Service laptop from an agent’s car last week.
And frankly, considering the shoddy and ulterior leftist reporting of most of the MSM now, TMZ seems to carry much more currency than it ever would have been reasonable to expect in the distant journalistic past.
The thief who swiped a Secret Service agent’s laptop targeted the agent in question and knew exactly what he was after … law enforcement sources tell TMZ.
Our sources say the thief — whom they say is a man — was caught on surveillance video pulling up to the agent’s driveway in an Uber at around 3 AM Thursday.
The video shows the man make a beeline for the agent’s car, removing a backpack with the computer inside and then walking off. As we reported, the hard drive contained Trump Tower floor plans and evacuation protocols, but the agency insists there was no classified info inside.
You don’t need to be Sherlock Holmes to make an educated presumption given the facts relayed in this news report. The thief was delivered via a potentially anonymous drop-off and consciously, efficiently even, directly approached the vehicle in question and took the specific items. Apparently with such rehearsed purpose that it didn’t raise any suspicions.
The question remains, assuming the accuracy of this report, who would have the premeditated knowledge of the items to be stolen and, crucially important, why.
I can only think of a few specific instances in which the thief would possess such precise knowledge of what was to be stolen.