Ah yeah, whatever.
In the era of big cinematic multiplexes and subpar entry-level help, it’s “understandable” that this kind of thing happens quite regularly.
The owner of a California movie theater is apologizing after a trailer for an R-rated upcoming Seth Rogen comedy was shown ahead of a screening of Disney’s “Finding Dory.”
The East Bay Times reports (http://bit.ly/2930i2e) moviegoers eager to see the PG-rated “Dory” at a Brenden theater in the Bay Area city of Concord were surprised earlier this month with a preview of Rogen’s “Sausage Party,” animated film with dark themes about what happens to food after it’s taken home from the supermarket.
Brenden vice president Walter Eichinger tells the newspaper it was a one-time mishap due to the theater “moving screens around in effort to accommodate several large last-minute groups wanting to see ‘Dory.'” He says the wrong movie was started by mistake and insists it won’t happen again.
So what? It’s a trailer for chrissakes. They don’t even show anything remotely lascivious in trailers.
A few years ago I took my son to watch a Woody Allen movie at the local multi and they started rolling Bridesmaids instead. This precipitated an immediate halting to the movie and a profuse public apology from the manager.
That assuredly did not make ABC’s news. Is the bar so low that stupid shit like this is now reported by the MSM cause the cheeldrun?
Remember it well.
Nothing is quite so dangerous as an intelligent man whose perceptiveness manifests as close-minded arrogance.
James Traub, a lecher stemming from the very lecherous CFR, has penned a muddled foray into passive damnation of the “commoners” and the political movements they (ignorantly) spawn and help perpetuate.
His essay, in Foreign Policy, is titled “It’s Time for the Elites to Rise Up Against Ignorant Masses” and is every bit as arrogant as it sounds; the embodied brainchild that such a self-ordained member of the smug-faced (see photo) intelligentsia could only construct.
Traub flails passively in this piece but elementally, the sincerest expression of his disdain for the non-academic brush he paints nationalists, and those who favor them, with, is summed in this paragraph.
The schism we see opening before us is not just about policies, but about reality. The Brexit forces won because cynical leaders were prepared to cater to voters’ paranoia, lying to them about the dangers of immigration and the costs of membership in the EU. Some of those leaders have already begun to admit that they were lying. Donald Trump has, of course, set a new standard for disingenuousness and catering to voters’ fears, whether over immigration or foreign trade or anything else he can think of. The Republican Party, already rife with science-deniers and economic reality-deniers, has thrown itself into the embrace of a man who fabricates realities that ignorant people like to inhabit.
Traub’s jaunty essay meanders through its indirect path of passive constraint, never directly damning in clear terms (unlike his antithetical Presidential candidate), but skirting and circumventing the true object of his derision. A man of too many brains and not enough testosterone-laced conviction.
This is the face of the enemy. These are the monsters who blossom in the twilight of our ignorance and apathy, and the CFR, the roost from which vile creatures proliferate and spawn.
And when the “distinguished” Canadian Parliament indulges in this kind of Obama fanboy circle jerk, the joke has indeed come full circle.
Canada, if you really want him, he will be free beginning January of next year. Have him, take him, enjoy his facile brand of cosmetic politicking. Got any banks you need to bail out? Feel the time is right for a bureaucratic health monolith you need to strap on to your government like an unwieldy sex device? Better yet, want one of those Obamaphones?
So take him away, please. I doubt you’ll meet much resistance, and when Donald Trump becomes President in November, rumor has it that you will be flooded with bitter American expatriates salivating at the thought of four more years of Barry.
Well, contrary to CNN’s shoddy polling design and disregard of basic statistics, the New York Times’ latest poll shows Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in a very close race as we enter the summer convention phase of the Presidential campaign.
Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump are deadlocked less than a month before the Democratic and Republican presidential conventions, according to a new national poll that shows the American electorate feeling disappointed in each candidate.
A Quinnipiac University survey released on Wednesday found that 42 percent of voters supported Mrs. Clinton while 40 percent backed Mr. Trump.
But there’s always a “but” when it comes to the media’s coverage of Trump. But. Voters still don’t like him, of course. Duh.
But the contentious tenor of the campaign is turning off voters, and most of them blame Mr. Trump. Quinnipiac’s poll found that 61 percent think that the campaign is increasing hatred and prejudice in the United States, and 67 percent of those who think that attribute it to the presumptive Republican nominee.
And apparently, some of those polled include globalist, let’s-inherit-the-world’s-problems tools.
Voters view Mr. Trump as being stronger on the economy and better suited to handle terrorism, while Mrs. Clinton is seen as more trusted by voters on immigration and handling international crises.
“More trusted” to hammer the last nail in America’s prosperity and sovereignty, whatever is left.
I doubt “likability” is very important when choosing our President. In fact, it’s better if we don’t collectively like our President. We want a President to rule, not to be our gushy sycophantic friend. I don’t particularly like Donald Trump but it won’t stop me from voting for him. Who the hell needs to “like” a Presidential candidate? You go with the one who you believe has the best interests of America at heart and the pragmatic, workable strategy, and balls, to make it work, and Hillary, at once despicable and unlikable, is ready to bury us knee-deep in global shit given the chance.
Unknown vandals/protesters set fire to several cars outside a mosque in the Western Australian city of Perth while children prayed inside on Tuesday night. The scene of the arson is also close to the Australian Islamic College where evening prayers had just begun.
Vandals also scrawled “F*** Islam” on a wall outside the mosque in Thornlie, Perth, which is adjacent to the Australian Islamic College.
Hundreds of local Muslims had gathered there for evening prayers.
Western Australian police confirmed four cars were set on fire using an accelerant. One of the vehicles had been completely destroyed in the blaze.
No one was injured in the attack.
Thornlie Mosque Imam Yahya Adel Ibrahim told CNN worshipers had run outside when they heard one of the cars explode.
On Instagram, Ibrahim later wrote that this was an “act of hate.”
That is all kinds of lame.
Do we need we be apprised of such an elemental fact that hate perhaps drove these actions?
Pro-Islamic, anti-Islamic, hate drives the Muslim dialogue from all directions. I doubt the vandals set fires to the car and wrote “Fuck Islam” out of boundless devotion and respect for Allah.
Fuck, for that matter, everything I do in this putrid life of mine is motivated by hate.
Things I hate, people I hate, places I hate, activities I hate, food I hate…hell, even hate that I hate. I’m a walking act of hate. Hate is the most natural emotion; everyone has a special little vile corner in their heart where hate lurks, but some of us fool ourselves that hate belongs only to others, and that our soul is a pristine temple of love where hate has no home. Bull.
Hate is natural. Embrace the hate. It doesn’t mean you’ll start blowing up cars and tagging obscene graffiti.
Maybe you’ll just…blog.
Now that is the embodiment of hate.