Slender Man is the greatest fucking urban legend EVER

And now he’s the motive behind a freaky under-age attempted stabbing murder in Wisconsin.

White kids murder because of Slender Man. Black kids murder…just because. This world is sick. Let me off this ride, quick.

knock knock
who’s there?

silence

Outside my window. Fucking beast.

Hell yah!

Slender Man

Posted in L3

P’Obama…he never had a chance: buried by the new “D&A” Era.

Like or dislike him, agree with his politics, or find them disgusting, you really should give Barack Obama a break. I do.

In many respects, he is the victim of the era, and frankly, he may be the first in a long line of “incompetent” and flailing American Presidents. This is not to dismiss or exculpate his role in many of the national boondoggles he’s inflicted upon the American people, but much of his ill fortune is directly or indirectly steered by the fact he is the first President to hold office in the wake of the modern technological age of rapidly accelerating self-destruction of modern society’s antiquated economic cycles and the master Consumer/Producer template.

We are embarking on a new paradigm of commerce and civilization that will see old economic models overturned. At the root of this rapid evolution are the advancement of technologies in the last 20-50 years. We are experiencing a chronic and persistent “unemployment” level that is no longer simply a “condition” that will alleviate itself according to historical periods of low employment, but instead appears to be a permanent state of societal disrepair that will only right itself once a new paradigm is absorbed and erected across the span of human existence.

I call this the era of “D&A.” Digitization and Automation.

Simply stated, the technologies that have sprung up in recent decades span an entirety of the two concepts implicated in D&A. Technology’s growth is exponential, not linear. From 1950-1990, the rate of technological growth was quite unlike that which we have seen since 1990, and very unlike that we’ve seen since 2005. This is the innate nature of exponential growth, and this is why technical evolution has outpaced our human capability to adapt, and why old archaic models of social structure and collective cultural design can not keep up with the nuts and bolts scientific progression that draws us forward. This includes the most conspicuous symptoms of high unemployment levels and the shifting delineations of class divisions (especially as embodied in the polarizing of the lower and upper classes with the concomitant dwindling of the middle).

This is why the myopic vision of most people is an unforgiving and relentless barbarian when it comes to doling out blame and interpretation of cause and effect, and why today’s (and tomorrow’s) POTUS will have a very bad time. The President will be left to soothe the myopia of the American populace which seeks solace in equally outdated ideological models of Conservative/Liberal and will argue from within this left/right context while failing to consider the larger chasms that are forming as a result of a society that is not yet prepared to collectively embrace the new D&A model.

The chasms of an old social system and a vibrant advancing technological architecture will be brutal and unforgiving to those empowered with convincing the American people that the chasm is really just a 4- or 8-year blip that can be solved by the prattling of Beltway politicians and countless government committees buried beneath layers of bureaucratic busywork.

The change is here, and the current Presidential crops, having originated during eras that pre-dated the D&A Era, will naturally resort to the outdated models (the only ones they know) that are no longer relevant. And will be entrusted with the unenviable task of answering to an electorate that is befuddled and ignorant of the collective maelstrom that is killing the American dream.

A President set up to fail.

We need a visionary President who has the balls to charge forth and build the new temples of 21st Century D&A society and whatever new social structures that may entail.

Posted in L6

Those damned “feelings chasing whores”

Saintluger wrote:

…my wife agrees, because she’s a real woman, not some “feelings” chasing whore who goes out and gets a new cock because the one she got at home ain’t taking care of business.

One thing all men need to realize is that women are innately so overwhelmed by sensory input (because they are built like walking antennae) that the baseline required for them to experience emotion and physical provocation is immense compared to a man’s.

This is why women act “dull” when conjuring, but like amped freaks when they are waiting. They are experiencing about 15% of the man’s experience (or 85% of his resting state).

Posted in L2

Discussion and too much talking are impediments to collective intellectual progress.

There is a human idiosyncrasy that you see everywhere. In all groups, you’ll note this behavior because ultimately, it is a human psychological trait that afflicts all, regardless of intelligence, class or calling.

No segment is to be singled out, but I was reminded of it during the recent wave of commentariat philosophy in the wake of the Elliot Rodger shooting and all the social implications it gave us the opportunity to ponder.

People tend to become addicted to narratives, hence arguments and templates for discussion. It’s herd mentality of the intellectual variety.

An argument, let’s simply call it “A causes B to do C,” becomes the predominant chain of reasoning in any group of perpetual discussion, and it gains the foothold that all dialogue must conform to. People find it quite easy to allow themselves to sink into the accepted and popular paradigm of cause and effect and argue from within the limited scope of this perspective.

I see brilliant people confined by the caves of popular narratives and it’s sad that any reasoning which strays from A to B to C (let’s say someone argues that “C is A and hence, B”) is shunned, ignored and drowned out by the communal cacophony of the predominant narrative.

People working and thinking in groups put the brakes on human cognitive progress because conformity usurps originality and autonomous thought experiment.

Solitary thinking (ie, writing and theorizing, not “discussing”) is the only progression worth a damn to human civilization.

Posted in L2

#yesallwomen…

…want is a healthy dose of cock.

Behind the smarmy, nasally self-assurance and grating toy confidence, behind the blustery empowered bullshit, yes, all women want is cock.

Posted in L5

I propose a new tagging convention to counteract the Culture of Sensitivity’s *trigger warning*

Bullet warning

There are lots of dead women in this post.

Posted in L2

To the first blogger who cries “Beta rage” …. lolz. Elliot Rodgers should have blamed the machines, not the women.

C’mon, let’s quit laying everything at the feet of this nebulous “Beta rage.”

Men have always experienced Beta rage, ever since Day 1 of the evolution parade. There have always been substantial portions of the male population who don’t get to be the prime breeders, but there is one difference between the Beta male of 5,000BC and the Beta male of 2014.

The males of antiquity still had the opportunity to exert a primal masculinity that was called for in one form or another because physical might was a force to be reckoned with, socially, culturally and economically.

It’s not the fault of women. Women haven’t changed that drastically, really. They are simple, impulsive creatures. Their gender role remains the immutable force of male defiance it’s always been. Women have always held great power over men, but in the past, men could express their discarded rage constructively.

That is the change. Men have no rage channels now.

Men must behave and play by female rules of propriety and timidity in 2014. Men must suppress their rage instead of building a factory or monument with their hands. Now the robots and machines do the man’s work.

Man should be mad at captains of industry who seek the cheapest bottom line, not women.

Elliot Rodgers of yore could have expressed masculinity in many ways other than being a hollow PUA player, a role he was ill-suited for. He could have contributed the mechanics of the world. But now, the machines have taken that from us men.

It’s not Beta rage…it’s human rage.

Posted in L3

The peril of progress and the church of control.

This is the most insightful meme I’ve ever seen on Facebook, courtesy of a Zen page I “belong” to, or whatever it is you refer to as such on Facebook.

Relax

Ah, the perils of control, the perils of humility.

The wonder of disembodied relinquishment of external influences and assumption of our inner strength.

Relax, nothing is in control.

Nothing is in control!

Never has been, and never will be. Does not need to be.

The peril of progress. As we conquer new facets of physical reality, we grow exceedingly confident that we are gods, and as we shrink the world with technology and invention, we succumb to the delusion that we reign over a false reality.

Relax. Nothing is in control and nothing needs to be in control.

Enjoy the helplessness, enjoy and fulfill your humanity. Your hapless spiral.

There is nothing more grand than welcoming your mortal obsequiousness.

Humility diminishes as we take the reigns over larger chunks of the world, but ultimately, control is a pursuit of infinity because chance, quantum culmination, exceeds our deliberate meddling.

Take control of nothing and savor the unknown.

I fear we find it increasingly difficult, with each generation of scientific orgasmic advancement, to relinquish control to that which defies our presumptions of advancement.

We can now print 3D reality and transfer human practice to the cold, capable hands of machines.

Of course we have control!

Still, with so much control bestowed upon our technology, we find it impossible to relax.

To be.

Posted in L3

Disneyland is ass and Tinker Bell is a syphilitic slut.

I don’t give a shit about Disneyland raising its prices for those imbalanced people who dare enter its oversized sweaty swamp of artificial gaiety.

Fuck Disneyland.

I hate Disneyland and its suffocating, shimmering crowds. I hate the lame rides, the escapist bullshit. It stifles my soul.

Hate it.

I hate Disney movies and all Disney entertainment, I hate what it does to our youth, I hate how it cures the under-aged meat of each generation into little consumerist talking pups living in worlds of fantasy and empty cotton candy bullshit pseudo-reality.

Disney is ass.

Disneyland can charge $5.00 to enter and you know what? I still wouldn’t step foot in that candy-scented cesspool.

Disneyland is for people who can’t deal with life which is basically all children and escapist adults who want to sugarcoat this slimy life that teems with sewage and depravity. Disney makes everything good again!

Animals talk, imaginary human beings of ethereal origin fall in love, magic is in the air, as is that little undersized cunt, Tinker Bell.

I’d like to see Tinker Bell wrap her insect-sized legs around my shaft and ride it like an electric horsey.

Bitch, just a Disney bitch.

Posted in L1

What becomes of the humans; a post-robotic paradigm, the new hierarchy scheme.

Earlier, on my indomitable Faceball wall, in reply to my friend’s posting of this article that cautions leeriness in the face of dazzling and hypnotic new technologies, especially the 7th slide of “Robots doing your job,” I wrote,

Robots

The 50-75% I alluded to comes from this paragraph about the robots’ predicted role in our collective societal future:

We listed robots as one of the tech trends that will indelibly shape our future, but they’re shaping the present and not always for the good. Robot (or automated) labor has become a hot topic of late, and while the debate on its effects remain unsettle, the trend seems clear: robots are doing an ever-larger share of the work, leaving their human counterparts out of work. In an in-depth report, the Associated Press estimated that 50 to 75 percent of the American workforce could be unemployed thanks to robot labor.

It’s clear that robotics will present the next stage of our technological evolution that was initiated the moment our distant ancestors discovered how to harness fire. The progression is exponentially furious, and advancements, mind-boggling and occluded, are happening in the span of lifetimes now.

All technological evolution is designed to alleviate the human role in the repetitive rigors of daily life. There is no use fighting it…robotics are here to stay, and they will become unfathomably advanced in the coming decades to a degree such that they will be able to do the majority of human tasks that are today conducted by flesh and blood.

This is fine, but, what happens to the humans (at least, prior to the singularity when soulless robots experience no qualms about enslaving their human creators)?

Today’s paradigm is one that has been in place for centuries, but it is weakening daily. The paradigm states that we create value for others above us on the ladder of social importance (in fact, this is how one aspires to importance…by being on the receiving end of grand doses of created value). This is what fuels our society, this is the fuel that feeds to upward churning of creation and transference.

But with the ascendance of robots, the old model dies, and this was the gist of my Facebook post.

What becomes of the lowly humans?

What becomes of humans who are no longer worth anything because they have been usurped in efficiency and speed by far superior conglomerations of nuts and bolts?

How will mankind rediscover worth and utility?
This will be the new paradigm once we shape the path to new worth. One in which the bottom-to-top linkage of hierarchical utility loses all validity and relevance.

How will society value us?

Will value even be important? Will “value” morph and evolve as a concept?

Perhaps the new paradigm will call on us to lead a more nuanced existence than the polar/linear “what can I do for you, and what can you do for him…” tension of upward mobility.

I foresee that human groups will form “alliances” with groups of robots. All humans will be aligned with specific brands, types, or designs of robot. This will allow the old paradigm of hierarchy to assume itself again, but with robots as the catalyst.

At least until they enslave us.

The new paradigm will merely be the intermediate step to eventual robotic imprisonment.

Posted in L2