Socialist writer describes the mechanics of America’s silent coup.


Look at what our good Socialist friends at WSWS have put together.



They’ve impressively assembled a narrative that clearly demonstrates how the Democratic Party is slowly, institutionally and insidiously being infiltrated by former members of the American intelligence and military community. The IC invasion is brazen and one-sided. The GOP can’t compete with this level of military staffing.

Deep State is alive and well, and the most frightening thing is that they don’t even attempt the pretense at “Deep” any longer. There is a quasi Fascist dynamic in that the Democratic Party is becoming One with Federal government, a scintillating vile union which only hints at a long, rugged doomed future for our children.

This Intelligence/Military usurpation of a political party is the horrid kernel of tyranny and totalitarianism:  a slow coup. From political inclusion spawns all manners of abusive power and corrupt favoritism. It’s not about “Left” or “Right.”  There is only “Establishment” versus “Liberation.” The DNC, jarred loose from its complacent slumber by the ascendancy of President Trump, is rallying its Establishment forces in order to procure many more generations of silent rule. It will see to it that no Donald Trumps happen for a very long time.

For the time being, until the Establishment is able to institute its behind-the-curtains realm of absolute power again, we will see them throw off the curtains as they shamelessly vie for rule while squelching Liberation, and in its place erect a facile structure of cosmetic “rights” and rewarded consumerism that will dull the public’s mind once again.  When the populace goes to sleep, Deep State rages.

Read this. It’s frightening.  I’ve pasted some noteworthy snippets.

Part 1.

An extraordinary number of former intelligence and military operatives from the CIA, Pentagon, National Security Council and State Department are seeking nomination as Democratic candidates for Congress in the 2018 midterm elections. The potential influx of military-intelligence personnel into the legislature has no precedent in US political history.

If the Democrats capture a majority in the House of Representatives on November 6, as widely predicted, candidates drawn from the military-intelligence apparatus will comprise as many as half of the new Democratic members of Congress. They will hold the balance of power in the lower chamber of Congress.

The Democratic leaders are promoting CIA agents and Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. At the same time, such people are choosing the Democratic Party as their preferred political vehicle. There are far more former spies and soldiers seeking the nomination of the Democratic Party than of the Republican Party.

Part 2

There are 57 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 44 congressional districts who boast as their major credential their years of service in intelligence, in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at the State Department, or some combination of all three.

Aside from their sheer number, and the fact that more than 40 percent, 24 of the 57, are women, there are other aspects worth considering.

The number of candidates who openly proclaim their role in the CIA or military intelligence. In years past, such activities would be considered confidential, if not scandalous for a figure seeking public office. Not only would the candidates want to disguise their connections to the spy apparatus, the CIA itself would insist on it, particularly for those who worked in operations rather than analysis, since exposure, even long after leaving the agency, could be portrayed as compromising “sources and methods.”

This is no longer the case. The 2018 candidates drawn from this shadow world of espionage, drone murders and other forms of assassination positively glory in their records. And the CIA and Pentagon have clearly placed no obstacles in the way.

Part 3.

There is growing popular hostility to the Trump administration, but within the political straitjacket of the two-party system, it is trapped without any genuine outlet. In November 2016, faced with the choice of equally repugnant ruling class figures—Hillary Clinton, the longtime stooge of Wall Street and the Pentagon, and Donald Trump, the corrupt billionaire from the financial underworld of real estate swindling and casino gambling—millions refused to vote. But disappointment and anger over the bankrupt, right-wing policies of the Obama administration led a sufficient number of working people to vote for Trump, particularly in devastated industrial states like Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia, that he could eke out an Electoral College victory despite losing the popular vote.

In a sense, the Democratic Party’s promotion of a large number of military-intelligence candidates for competitive districts represents an insurance policy for the US ruling elite.

The preponderance of national security operatives in the Democratic primaries sheds additional light on the nature of the Obama administration. Far from representing a resurgence of liberal reformism, as apologists for the Democrats like the International Socialist Organization claimed at the time of his election, Obama’s eight years in office marked the further ascendancy of the military-intelligence apparatus within the Democratic Party.


Those of us on the far right should not be deterred by the Socialist vibe.

Part 3 is especially laden with this as this is the concluding section where the writer lays it all out. Interestingly, in our times, the odd juxtaposition of Trump’s quasi-populism with Socialist ideals, lends quirky overlap hinting at what the Socialists want and what we, on the Right, would like. Liberation.

This report illustrates that Liberation is ultimately noxious to the elites and their stranglehold over American power is not to be extinguished any time soon.

Their power is corrupt, limitless and self-perpetuating. If we wish to kill it, we must burn it down.




Trump’s great Golden Showdown is beginning.

In light of something I wrote over a year ago, on January 25 , 2017, the current matter involving California versus Donald Trump’s Federal government seems harsher than ever. President Trump’s impending visit to San Diego next week might very well prove to be the opening kick-off to the civil festivities.

I concluded last year’s post:

All this, in the context of Donald Trump’s enlarging Presidential presence, struck me for the inevitable collision course this state and the President of the United States are heading toward. Immigration is the new slavery. Donald Trump has titillated us with talk of Federal intervention in murderous Chicago. What this would be composed of, we just don’t know. But his “will send in the Feds!” Tweet last night was resoundingly clear. He will entertain use of Federal resources in order to maintain the integrity and health of our nation. And if California and Jerry Brown decide they’ve “outgrown” the American Republic, don’t expect President Trump to back down nor to allow Californian delusion to evolve much further.

Sacramento might very well be the next Fort Sumter.





I’ve been waiting for this!

Donald visits the greatest state in the nation!


Donald Trump will visit California next week, his first visit to the Golden State as president, the White House announced on Wednesday.

Sources familiar with Trump’s plans say he is expected to visit California to the U.S.-Mexico border to look at border wall prototypes in the San Diego area.

The President and White House have been looking to schedule a trip to the border “for a while,” one source said. Trump has not visited California since he was sworn into office, though Vice President Mike Pence did a lucrative fundraising swing through the state in October.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders confirmed Trump is traveling to California next week but did not provide more specific details.

Asked why he’s making the trip, Sanders said Trump had been busy enacting elements of his agenda, such as creating jobs and growing the economy.



Coincidentally, last week I was contemplating writing a post in which I plead with Trump to visit this state.  Oh well…it all works out in the end.


And The End might very well embody such a Presidential visit here.



Off-Broadway takes a fatal hit and the rising power of the HapaSteins.

The urban Liberalentsia is so cute when they feel strongly about something.

This is a class of people generally more concerned about consumerist ego-posturing which finds opinionated expressiveness more difficult and unproductive than they care for.  When they find something to feel strongly about (ie, Donald Trump), their emotional displays appear strange, spastic and foreign, like a dog wearing pantyhose (hey, shit happens).



And when they do find a subject worthy of their opinion, it is something that strikes a chord in their well-structured innocuous lives; something that upsets the apple cart of their mundane rehearsed commercialized existence.

And for Brooklynites today, that chord is the sanctity of their crosswalks.

If you can’t cross the street according to script, our life is disrupted. Hey, I need to dramatize this fact! I’ll flail like a loon.

Motley crew, aren’t they?





And one may wonder, what could possibly conjure such fierceness in these city dwellers?

Why, dead children!

Dead children are the driver of today’s narrative. Guns, cars, loopy (pill-popping, texting) drivers like Dorothy Bruns.


Kinda hot, actually…


A 20-month-old boy and a 4-year-old girl were killed in a Brooklyn intersection on Monday, struck by a car that slammed into them and the girl’s pregnant mother.

Details of the crash and how it occurred were still emerging, officials said. But the Police Department’s chief spokesman said the crash did not appear to be an intentional act.

“It doesn’t look like anything deliberate at this point, but we have to figure it out,” said the spokesman, Stephen P. Davis. “It is terrible.”

The 44-year-old woman who was driving the car that hit the people did not flee, Mr. Davis said. She suffered minor injuries, officials said, after her 2012 Volvo continued onward after hitting the pedestrians until it struck some parked cars.


Oy.  We’re assaulted by the mandatory disclaimer “not an intentional act” in official police communique parlance nowadays. Sad times.

I suspect this incident might have gone largely unheralded except for two important factors:

1) One of the children killed, Abigail, aged 4, was the daughter of rising stage actress, Ruthie Ann Miles, a Korean woman married to a “Blum,” an urban archetype if every there was one.



We’ve entered a  21st Century era in which the marriage (literally) of two ethnicities is manifesting a doomed American dialogue of HapaStein offspring which will shape the future of American social politics.  It ain’t pretty, but it’s very cute.


This is the demographic that is the American future.

Us “Trumpeteers” are a dying breed, and it won’t be long before we are extinguished by the HapaSteins.  The Urban Liberalentsia. A world in which civic action is dictated by crosswalks and the miserable fatalism of the real world, all unconquerable. The Urban Liberalentsia seeks to conquer immutable rocks and is assuaged by movement and volume, not by action.

The smug Libs find a cause to be smug about.


Law ‘n’ Order Bergs


It’s hollow virtue signaling. There is no foundation to their dramatics, only facile reactions. They do not seek change, they seek catharsis. Catharsis dies and ebbs but the problems and dysfunction persist stubbornly. For there is always a new Apple product or Connected home gadget to buy tomorrow. The promise of external reward never dies.



I did promise two factors that would elicit such a reaction from the Urban Liberalentsia.

The second is that the suspect, Dorothy, aka Bruns, is ostensibly an American citizen of semi-White status.

If she was Jose Garcia Zarate, driving with a .18 BAC level when she crept through that crosswalk, I suspect this incident might not have had piernas (look it up).

The death of these children invited HapaStein virulence because the players were not protected by the liberal narrative.

Ultimately, we are living in an American, and Western, society in which the elites not only shape industry and commerce, but social mores as well. The media, an offspring of elitist spending and values, follow suit.

There will be nothing left but vacuity and blabber, interspersed with dead children and blundering motor vehicle operators.

But there is a Google-powered self-driving solution for that. In the end, humans will only need to be reminded to breathe.

Brains?  Bah.  Who needs that when CNN is around to force feed opinions.