My teachers didn’t look like that when I was in school…

That was my first thought when reading of yet another illicit female teacher-student liaison, this time at Barstow High School in California’s desert gateway to Las Vegas.

A Barstow High School teacher is out on bail after being arrested amid a probe into an inappropriate relationship she was alleged to be having with an underage student, officials said Monday.

Authorities began investigating 51-year-old Katherine O’Neill, of Barstow, after someone came into the local sheriff’s station last Thursday to report the teacher was sexually abusing a 16-year-old girl, San Bernardino County sheriff’s officials said in a news release.

O’Neill has already been on administrative leave since October, deputies said. Before that, she had taught American government and history classes at the high school on First Avenue, according to the school’s website.

Detectives interviewed the student victim about the allegations and determined the teen and teacher had indeed been engaged in a sexual relationship. In addition to physical abuse, O’Neill is accused of sending the girl explicit text messages with obscene material, authorities said.

Investigators say the crimes occurred at various locations within Barstow.

It was unclear whether the student was in any of O’Neill’s classes.

The teacher was arrested Friday on suspicion of penetration with a foreign object, oral copulation with a minor, annoying and molesting and sending harmful matter to a minor.

O’Neill was released from custody the next day after posting $100,000 bail, officials said.

A court appearance has yet to be scheduled, inmate records show.

 

That thought was quickly extinguished when I saw what Katherine O’Neill looked like.

 

 

Nope.  This is exactly how they looked when  I was in school.

 

Detectives believe O’Neill could have additional victims.

 

Wasn’t me, I’ll guarantee you that…

 

**archive**

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Queen of Liberal tropes, fails to accuse Asians of “systemic excellence.”

The other day I mentioned one of the most common Leftist semantic tropes in today’s dialog: the indulgence in the use of the word “inclusive” to denote grievance and castigation.

This morning, I saw another Leftist trope which essentially serves the same Liberal function. An ostensibly neutral word garnered for their own political agenda and regurgitated incessantly to the bitter end. And if there is anyone better suited to regurgitate said Leftist tropes, it’s none other than our favorite walking trope.

 

system(ic) failure

An ambiguous phrase the Left uses to defer blame to everyone and anything except the Chronic Victim of the Day.

Yes, I agree; systemic failure defines the very fact that less that 1% of Black applicants are accepted to Stuyvesant, but the flawed system is ethnic/familial, not educational.

Are we to assume Asians suffer from systemic excellence?

I wonder if, in the same vein as Ambrose Bierce’s The Devil’s Dictionary, we oughta compile a thorough list of all Liberal catchphrases and hijacking of the English language to persistently spout emotive arguments lacking in reason or logic. Words which, inculcated with leftist symbolism, are used in place of intelligent or cohesive description or explanation.

**archive**

The phenomenal self-delusion of the modern Liberal female

I’m predisposed toward making a funny about this photograph, but duty calls and I find that I must intrude with a comment.

We laugh and smirk at this foolish woman, but I can say with complete assurance that the self-delusion embodied in this photograph is borne out by personal experience.  Why is it that the most despicable, vile women tend to hold Liberalism and their own misplaced sense of attractiveness so shamelessly close to their hearts?

 

The Left’s fascination with Inclusive Porn.

What is it with Liberals and their “inclusive” fetish?

The word, or any derivative of, inclusive, is every Liberal’s go-to gateway expression of virtue and platitude-embossed outpouring of condemnation/scolding/proselytizing. “Inclusive” is singularly the most reliable signaling mechanism by which we can know whether said messenger is reasonable, or if said messenger is merely a ranting leftist.

Want to let the world know you’re a lefty?

Indulge in some shameless Inclusive Porn.

We’ll get the idea. Facile expressions of concern can only mean one thing.

**archive**

Christianity versus Islam in the agnostic world.

It’s beyond religion.

If it was only a matter of religion, their manner of devotion would not influence my life. If it was only religion, their dogma would remain self-contained and exist “amicably” within the structure of liberal western culture.

As an atheist, I frankly wouldn’t give 2 farts more about Islam than I would Christianity.

But it’s more than a matter of religion.

Much more.

It’s because it is more than religion that the reasonable disclaimer “not all Muslims are violent” or “not all Muslims hate Christians (or Americans)” doesn’t matter. In human society, religion encompasses all manners, all layers of existence and social structure. Religion collectively shapes and molds society. Religion is the benchmark of a society’s values and tolerances and expectations of the individual’s role in the collective body of community. Religion shapes and defines society, even to non-believers. I dare atheists to argue that our human culture is not indelibly molded and infiltrated by the ancient strains of religion stretching back thousands of years.

Religion is us; we are religion.

In fact, atheists spend a good portion of their whiny days complaining about the ubiquitous presence of religion in our society. ‘Tis how it is, my atheist friends. Religion is the spine of society. It dictates our mores and priorities in measures that might have nothing to do with “God,” per se.

So if this was only about God, or about Allah, I don’t think I’d care.

I wish we would re-frame the timeless clash between Christianity and Islam in a more accurately complex framework than the simplistic duality of religion versus religion. It’s not Islam, it’s the values and outlook that religion denotes for a society.

The Islamic world view is fundamentally unable to coexist in a historically Christian society, and vice versa. The values it imbues in its adherents are alien concepts to the individualistic traits bestowed by Christianity. The nature of society conferred by a predominant Islamic presence are readily visible to those of us viewing from the “outside.” I stress this, without judgment, for that is the advantage of being an atheist: who knows which religion is more virtuous, more emblematic of holy human nature. Which religion embraces, rewards, and perpetuates the highest and most lofty levels of humanity?

Who knows? That’s a judgment call, for all calls are ultimately judgment-based when you’re an atheist. But I will say that Islamic society is disruptive and harmful to existing Western Christian society and it does not belong there. If Islam stayed in Islam instead of spreading like a dogmatic cancer, voraciously infecting the cells of Western society and creating havoc and disorder, the dynamic would be much different. Islam is fine for Islamic countries, but it has no business trying to embed itself in the Christian West where it does not belong.

But that is what is happening.

Sure, I’ll give you this: not all Muslims are bad. Of course not. This is a quaint truism that can be used to rebut all stereotypes, but the fact remains that religion is a collective mindset, a cultural movement that rises beyond the individual’s place in amorphous society. Religion steers behavior, over time. Behavior does not cause religion. You might have 998 Muslims out of 1,000 who are law-abiding, non-violent neighbors, but the same cannot be said of their religion. The more prevalent Islam becomes in the West, the more it will monstrously draw its adherents into a mission of usurpation. The followers of Islam, like all religions, will become robots chanting the underlying tropes of the religion.

The West is actively, self-destructively, importing Islamic minions from all over the world and our domestic bleeding-heart idiocracy  revels in the virtuous and globalist nature of their one-world, diversity agenda.

“Muslims are just like us,” they beam.

Yes, that Muslim is just like you, but that Muslim’s religion is assuredly not.

And that religion, the antithesis to the fruitful, liberal Western existence you love and indulge in like the hypocritical Marxist hedonists that you are, will perish at the hands of the religion that invaded you with non-violent people who were “just like us.”

Enjoy your last sputtering moments in the sun, Western scum.

 

Embrace your new god.