Fake CNN flails as it tries to avoid a Janet Cooke fate.

June 26th, 2017 by Socially Extinct

 

Embedded deeply in CNN’s meta narrative concerning its own ideologically-propelled fake news gamble-that-lost, there is this dubious passage to be found.

 

 

 

In a staff meeting Monday afternoon, investigative unit members were told that the retraction did not mean the facts of the story were necessarily wrong. Rather, it meant that “the story wasn’t solid enough to publish as-is,” one of the people briefed on the investigation said.

 

 

“Solid?”

 

Aside from being a conveniently subjective description of reporting practices, “solid” means nothing, and in the context that CNN defers to the adjective in order to placate its inner corporate demons, it’s merely a cynical distortion of accountability that glosses over the fact that the Commie News Network, so driven by left-wing motives inculcated by its Democratic tendrils, will desperately band-aid this journalistic farce before it cooks (as in Janet) their dwindling “reputation.”

 

 

 

 

 

**archive**

 

 

 

 

“Bacon&Q” – why don’t we call symbolic anti-Islam hate crimes “Art” and free up the criminal justice system to deal with real crime?

June 25th, 2017 by Socially Extinct

 

Nothing drives home a good bout of Islamophobic defacement like a cleverly constructed piece which unifies the elements of paper and food.  When your outsider religion’s rabid dogma is centered around a few alienating practices, that is what we latch on to.

 

So abstention from pork is a major tenet of your religion? Fine, I’ll douse your churches and communities with pork; nothing screams pork like a narrow sliver of mouth-watering bacon!

 

Look, a culture’s native cuisine is the primary tool by which one assimilates. If your food customs are directly antithetical to a great portion of the native’s preferred palate, don’t expect seamless, or even the vaguest gestures, of acceptance. We love our pork in the civilized, Christian West. Your “swineaphobia” not not endear you, sorry to say.

 

 

Bacon&Q

 

And that weird holy book you read with all the apostrophes.  There is little about the Islamic dogma we identify with, much less recognize. Complicating matters are those “handful” of zealots who kill us because we don’t accept your teachings;  minus them, we’d probably accommodate you with kindness for we are a very liberal society.

 

But despite this openness, we are (most of us) a suspicious and guarded lot, and we aren’t inclined to let strangers with dark motivations walk in our door without question. This was the backbone of our character until the past few decades when Western elites have decided it’s fitting to dilute the sharply cautious, but benevolent, Western character with blind acceptance of all enemies. Whereas in the past there was rigorous caution, we now penalize manifestations of this “xenophobic” tendency. In dystopic Germany, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to question anything, however harmful or threatening it may be to domestic security.

 

And in California, harmless Bacon&Q gestures of public demonstration against this protected religion can buy you a felony record.

 

 

Authorities in California are investigating two possible hate crimes, against Islamic centers in Sacramento and Davis.

 

The Sacramento County sheriff’s department said it was investigating an incident at Masjid Annur Islamic Center in Sacramento. Officials said a deputy was waved down by a citizen on Saturday afternoon and was led to a burned Qur’an filled with bacon, hanging by a handcuff from a fence.

 

Officials told the Sacramento Bee newspaper sheriff’s hate crime detectives were called to the scene, and the department’s community relations unit contacted leaders of the Islamic Center to offer assistance.

 

 

 

The highfalutin community policing hoops that we jump through in the United States to sate the anxieties of an antagonistic religion baffles me. Are fatwa’s not considered threats, ie, hate crimes? Why are those not part of the West’s forbidden thought paradigm?

 

 

Masjid Annur Islamic Center is the largest mosque in the greater Sacramento area, officials said.

 

The Bee reported that in a separate incident someone driving by in a car threw pages torn out of a Qur’an into the Islamic Center of Davis on Friday night, during evening prayer.

 

In January, a woman broke windows at the mosque and left bacon strips on the entrance handles. The woman, 30-year-old Lauren Kirk-Coehlo, recently received five years’ probation after pleading guilty to a felony hate crime.

 

 

 

Our criminal justice system, especially in California, has bigger things to worry about than these ideological art projects people take upon themselves to express opposition to Islam.

 

Is this really so bad, so harmful? Considering the mayhem which Islam perpetrates on innocents around the world, it seems to me Bacon&Q is a pretty innocuous expression of free speech.  In the feminized, hysterical ramparts of America, apparently free speech is a worse fate than beheading or caged human torching.

 

I would suggest to Lauren Kirk-Coehlo, and other unfortunates like her who find themselves persecuted by the West’s Liberal Complex for their “unpopular” views, that they re-brand their protests as “art.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As an example, if the perpetrator of the “evil” Islamaphobic project in Sacramento were to merely call it Art, and furthermore, were to legitimize it with an artsy name, I presume they would escape hate crime implications since Western artists likewise have been spared criminal prosecution for defacing Christian motifs under the guise of “art.”

 

 

 

Piss Christ by Serrano Andres (1987)

 

 

**archive**

 

**archive**

 

 

Tamish and Rajiv Mukeherjee give a whole new meaning to the concept of “Left” and “Right” – brained…

June 23rd, 2017 by Socially Extinct

 

What an absolutely horrible genetic travesty!

 

How is such a random unfolding of genetic replication allowed to continue by the good evolutionary sense of physiological nature without being humanely halted quickly before such ill-equipped monstrosities can be visited upon our humble planet??

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Twins” Tamish and Rajiv do not look like normal (or even aberrational) twins.

 

But they are. “Hidden twins,” so to speak. Horrifically so.

 

 

 

Mumbai| Doctor Jagadhish Parsa, who assisted yesterday in the birth of a baby born with a rare malformation causing him to have two distinct brains crammed inside his head, claims that the newborn could be a unique case of two separate minds sharing a single head and body. Tamish and Rajiv Mukeherjee were born at 09:10 AM at the Saiffe Hospital, after a long and complicated surgical operation meant to extract them safely from their mother’s womb.

 

The boys are a unique case of disrosopus, a rare condition in which twins share the same body but have separate faces and brains.

 

The problem being that the Mukeherjee twins’ anomalous birth defect is horribly concealed within one very large skull. They are lacking the “tell-all” second face which we would expect of such ghastly natural train wrecks. One face, two brains. As opposed to the converse phenomenon of two faces, half a brain, a condition known as “disropoliticus” which seems to have infested Washington D.C.

 

 

The size of his head, which already caused many complications at the time of his birth, will without a doubt constitute a major problem. The sheer weight of it could easily be sufficient to break the boys’ cervical spine if not supported carefully. Besides from that problem, the twins’ internal organs all seem to function normally, leaving hope that they could possibly live many years in rather decent living conditions.

 

An important question remains however concerning the capacity of the boys to eventually walk or speak, since these basic actions would demand an exceptional coordination from both of them to execute. Tamish controls the left eye, arm and leg, while Rajiv controls their right counterparts. The twins have already demonstrated strange faculties, as one them can fall asleep while the other is awake, leaving one half of the body inert while the other is active.

 

 

 

Oh my god.

 

Kill it with fire!

 

**archive**

 

 

The NY Times asks: What’s more important, saving women’s lives, or saving the image of Islam?

June 23rd, 2017 by Socially Extinct

 

A damning piece in the NYT yesterday, “They Brushed Off Kamala Harris. Then She Brushed Us Off,” calls out the sheer self-involved hypocrisy of the American Left when it comes to their tenuous relationship with the Islamic religion and its punitive world view. Authors Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Asra Q. Nomani essentially dare to point out that the Left’s fixation on human rights and social justice only extends as far as its own insular, less than collective embrace of concern for all when it involves going against the rightful liberal fetishized victim of the day.

 

 

The very next day, Senator Harris took her seat in front of us as a member of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. We were there to testify about the ideology of political Islam, or Islamism.

The Democrats on the panel, including Senator Harris and three other Democratic female senators — North Dakota’s Heidi Heitkamp, New Hampshire’s Maggie Hassan and Missouri’s Claire McCaskill — did not ask either of us a single question.

Just as we are invisible to the mullahs at the mosque, we were invisible to the Democratic women in the Senate.

No, what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives when it comes to confronting the brutal reality of Islamist extremism and what it means for women in many Muslim communities here at home and around the world. When it comes to the pay gap, abortion access and workplace discrimination, progressives have much to say. But we’re still waiting for a march against honor killings, child marriages, polygamy, sex slavery or female genital mutilation.

In other words, when we speak about Islamist oppression, we bring personal experience to the table in addition to our scholarly expertise. Yet the feminist mantra so popular when it comes to victims of sexual assault — believe women first — isn’t extended to us.

In other words, when we speak about Islamist oppression, we bring personal experience to the table in addition to our scholarly expertise. Yet the feminist mantra so popular when it comes to victims of sexual assault — believe women first — isn’t extended to us.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And the coup d’ grâce:

 

 

That’s because in the rubric of identity politics, our status as women of color is canceled out by our ideas, which are labeled “conservative” — as if opposition to violent jihad, sex slavery, genital mutilation or child marriage were a matter of left or right. This not only silences us, it also puts beyond the pale of liberalism a basic concern for human rights and the individual rights of women abused in the name of Islam.

 

There is a real discomfort among progressives on the left with calling out Islamic extremism. Partly they fear offending members of a “minority” religion and being labeled racist, bigoted or Islamophobic. There is also the idea, which has tremendous strength on the left, that non-Western women don’t need “saving” — and that the suggestion that they do is patronizing at best.

 

Bingo.

 

 

Nancy Pelosi’s diurnal emission.

June 22nd, 2017 by Socially Extinct

 

 

Just cause its bears noting…