In a reversal of Chinese food chain, is the dog coming to the rescue, or for dinner?

October 19th, 2017 by Socially Extinct

Watch the dog.

 

 

The dog noticed, thought he could help.  Thought to himself, “This is China, fuck it, peace out.”

 

Or, “Tasty bitch!  Now you’re my special combo plate!” before being chased off by the guilt-ridden driver.

 

 

 

 

Weiner’s laptop was Huma’s cloud server (2,800 documents later)…

October 17th, 2017 by Socially Extinct

 

 

 

 

In the latest bureaucratic “development” in the long, painful campaign on the part of Judicial Watch to tease out the trove of emails between ex-sweethearts, Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin, word came through today that the FBI found 2,800 such documents on Weiner’s laptop, all which have been sent to the State Department. Lest you get your hopes up, this most likely  presents yet another agonizing, futile step in the mining of subterranean transactions among corrupt upper level Clintonian brass.

 

The FBI reportedly found 2,800 government documents on disgraced former U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner’s personal laptop computer that were related to his estranged wife’s work as Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff during her tenure as secretary of state.

 

The conservative group Judicial Watch reported Tuesday that the State Department received the documents from the FBI after Judicial Watch sued the department when it failed to respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

 

The documents were sent to Weiner’s computer by Huma Abedin, a revelation that came to light in the closing days of last year’s presidential campaign.

 

“This is a disturbing development. Our experience with Abedin’s emails suggest these Weiner laptop documents will include classified and other sensitive materials,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “When will the Justice Department do a serious investigation of Hillary Clinton’s and Huma Abedin’s obvious violations of law?”

 

Judicial Watch initially sued the State Department in May 2015, after it failed to respond to a request to produce all official emails sent or received by Abedin using a non-government address.

 

In a court filing, the State Department said it expected to review and produce the entire cache of 2,800 documents by the end of this year. However, the government filing also suggests that some of the material is “duplicative” of other records that have already been made public.

 

Last month, Weiner was sentenced to 21 months in prison after pleading guilty to sending sexually explicit texts across state lines to a 15-year-old girl. Similar indiscretions, first as a congressman and then as a candidate for New York City mayor, had scuppered Weiner’s political career.

 

Abedin filed for divorce from Weiner earlier this year.

 

 

 

Yes, let’s see which scraps we’re left after the State Department’s coyotes anxiously devour the carcass of all damning evidence. Pages of blank redacted space, brittle, meatless skeleton.

 

 

 

 

**archive**

Harvey Weinstein, the Monster, will be wielded as a distraction by the elites who don’t want us digging deeper.

October 15th, 2017 by Socially Extinct

 

On October 5, shortly after the New York Times published its eye-opening exposé detailing Harvey Weinstein’s depraved misadventures, the subject of said exposé sent the newspaper a “statement” which I suspect was penned without anticipation of the shitstorm that was about to be unleashed by writers Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey. The statement was a rote brush-off knee-jerk apology soaked in crocodile tears and stinking of quasi-apologetic platitudes. If Weinstein had realized, before composing the letter, the vast network of shenanigans that would be revealed as a byproduct of his mainstream exposure, his apology would have worn quite a different tone.

 

As it was, his statement concluded with an egregious dose of aggressive virtue signaling that frankly appears to be an oblique SOS targeted at the powers that be which had assiduously enabled and cloaked his behaviors in the past.  A past which is now dead and gone and Harvey is on his own.

 

 

 

 

 

Weinstein could not anticipate the unfolding narrative which would envelope him in a pall of sinister and repugnant moral darkness that would alienate all his longstanding “allies.”  The “rescue flare” he embedded in his statement intended for his coastal Leftist enablers went unheeded.   The shame of all matters Weinstein sent friends and political affiliates and business partners scurrying.  Everyone sought to extricate themselves from Harvey Weinstein in any way possible.  No one dared come to Harvey’s aid.   It is doubtful he expected things to escalate as they did.   Welcome to the new digital economy, Harvey.  Thirty years ago the matter would have been batted about by the news networks and would have receded as surely as the network bosses needed to deposit  their next paycheck.  In 2017, the news torch is never simply snuffed out;  it is passed from one social media hand to the next, and the matter becomes inflamed and the coil of public opinion and curiosity energizes it beyond any humanly means available to extinguish.

 

Instead, he issued a statement that was a naked, pitiful attempt at deferring to old modes of Weinsteinian escape that were simply no longer available.

 

His virtue signals were abandoned by everyone and thus laid bare for all to see.

 

Apparently leftists seek catharsis through the act of opposing conservatives rather than seeking to raise the principled interests of liberalism.  Did a man in his position deserve to channel anger so much as he needed to channel a constructive escape plan?  Anger?  Is that how Harvey Weinstein reacted to the breaking story?

 

The Right should keep this in mind.  The MSM and liberals will increasingly focus on Weinstein, The Monster, as a deflection.  H. Weinstein is “insignificant” in that he is only the representation of a deep, malevolent self-perpetuating society that is affixed, parasitically, to the core of our culture.   Weinstein is a symptom, not the phenomena;  in the same way Father XXXXX was merely the symptom of a corrupt Catholic Church…not the distorted hierarchy itself.

 

Beware long journalistic treatises which focus on making the Weinstein narrative a distractive sideshow, when in fact we should pay attention to the beast, the cultural structure, which spawned and sustained him and the rest of his crooked ilk parading behind the guise of “liberalism.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

125 New York narcissists call the Trump black.

October 14th, 2017 by Socially Extinct

 

What do you do if you believe Donald Trump is a narcissist?

 

Why you organize a march, aka SJW parade, designed to bring attention to this festering conviction.  You also bring attention to yourself, and your pitiful professional organization as well.  For no one understands a narcissist better than an over-degreed narcissist;  a smug vile group of supercilious “shrinks” exudes the stench  of narcissism like no other.

 

 

They’re not nuts about Trump.

 

Some 125 psychologists and other mental health professionals marched along lower Broadway Saturday to demand that President Trump be thrown out of office, based on a constitutional clause allowing presidents to be ousted when their cabinets decide they are ” unable to discharge the powers and duties” of their job.

 

“We can sense the power of Trump’s underlying fear that he is worthless and weak by how intensely he resists and retaliated against any criticism,” said Harry Segal, a Cornell University psychologist.

 

“No matter how minor, he can’t let anything go.”

 

Michelle Golland, also a clinical psychologist, agreed.

 

“We’re actually suffering from his narcissistic personality,” she said. “He has no empathy. You can feel it, the way he spoke about the San Juan mayor… She has PTSD and our president mistreats her. She is re-victimized. That is a narcissist.”

 

The marchers, dressed in black and wearing red plastic strips around their necks reading “Danger,’’ were led by psychologist Peter Fraenkel of City College, who carried a drum and beat out a funereal rhythm.

 

 

 

 

 

**archive**

Jimmy Kimmel, archetypal Leftist, selectively defines when his BS is…not.

October 14th, 2017 by Socially Extinct

 

Gotta love these Hollywood types.

 

They proselytize their leftist tropes and yammer incessantly with all the elite coastal condescension and self-righteousness they can muster, but when their words conflict with their actions, they suddenly withhold their idiocy under the guise of dignity.

 

They have no dignity. Sleazeballs like Jimmy Kimmel feel no compunction about rallying around the pulpit of leftist righteousness when it comes to self-defining the temperature of American culture, but when it hits a little too close to home, they clam up.

 

 

 

 

 

Kimmel weakly explained his reluctance to comment on Harvey Weinstein & Scandal.  In fact, he blathered on nonsensically in a rambling fit of avoidance that gives me a headache.

 

 

 

“First of all, the Harvey Weinstein thing, people like this false equivalence of that’s somehow equivalent to what happened in Las Vegas. 

 

Kimmel also said that he fears ‘gun nuts’ angry about him being outspoken about the Las Vegas shooting will “try to take any comedy bit I did out of context and use it as some kind of proof’ that he is doesn’t speak up for women.”

 

 

Huh?

 

Less confounding are his words as spelled out in the Daily Mail’s headline.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kimmel has no problem assuming our cultural conscience when he’s speaking about Donald Trump.  But if it concerns a sexually-crazed Democratic Hollywood bigwig, he pleads the Fifth.  For Hollywood Libs, selective amnesia gives way to selective idealism.  Otherwise known as hypocrisy.

 

**archive**